The extension is intended to provide greater certainty for employers, allowing a degree of planning for the future. … Read more
Barbara Bento shows why HMRC's information it receives is only powerful if it is accurate. … Read more
Join our webinar to find out what HMRC are looking for and how to strengthen your claim. … Read more
130 Wood Street, London, EC2V 6DL
enquiries@buzzacott.co.uk T +44 (0)20 7556 1200
It’s the last budget before the UK is due to leave the European Union, and will set the tone for the British economy in the years after Brexit.
In recognition of this, the Confederation of British Industry (CBI) has issued its budget submission, demanding that “The Chancellor of the Exchequer turn warm words for business into action – no ifs, no buts”.
It urged the Chancellor to raise the annual investment allowance from £200,000 to £500,000 for two years and to explore ways of increasing capital spending in the technology sector.
This comes off the back of news that the UK ranks lowest out of the G7 in terms of business investment as a proportion of GDP. The Director-General of the CBI, Carolyn Fairbairn, noted that the problem doesn’t stem from businesses being reluctant to invest, “but because the conditions are so often not conducive to doing so.”
And of course, when there isn’t enough investment, it directly impacts on productivity, which is at its lowest level since the 1990s. This, for me, is what truly drives the reduction in GDP – and it needs to be solved.
It’s vital that we reverse this, and make the UK into a growth environment for business – especially in the technology sector.
We’re pleased to see these suggestions from the CBI, and we support it in its calls to create a better investment environment. Raising the annual investment allowance is definitely a step in the right direction.
But this only favours businesses that are profitable who can use this allowance. By being focused on profitable businesses incentive depriving start-ups and scale-ups – and there were 10,016 incorporated in 2017 – from accessing the same benefits.
Instead of encouraging profitable businesses to invest more, we want to extend the opportunity to those who haven’t had it previously. And this means young companies who haven’t yet entered profitability or rapidly growing high technology businesses who are already investing but could be encouraged to spend more to be properly world leading.
Focusing on start-ups and scale-ups is the best way to increase the number of businesses who are investing. And since the UK tech sector is powered by these businesses, enabling them to grow seems a winning formula for injecting growth into the whole industry.
A more inclusive approach would be to look into cashback schemes.
Today, it’s probably just as good to leave money in the bank when compared to investing in capital equipment. This is where research and development (R&D) incentives should come into action.
We agree with the CBI that the UK R&D credit scheme should be reviewed to ensure it is the world’s most competitive. Currently, the R&D tax credit scheme works because it offers cashback to loss-making or non-tax paying businesses – which applies to most start-ups or scale-ups. But it is limited in its scope and does not cover capital investments.
The equivalent scheme for capital expenditure does not offer the same cash back benefits and most start-up or scale-up businesses ignore this incentive altogether as it provides no immediate support.
If the UK is to strengthen its position in the technology sector, we need to start seeing a cashback element to improve the return on investment calculations. Why shouldn’t the UK incentives support businesses to investing in the latest development hardware or testing products that could substantially improve the productivity within their R&D teams?
One idea would be to bring in a cashback element to research and development allowance schemes when purchases are related to high technology capital equipment to be used in R&D projects. This would also support those businesses developing technology who tend to struggle for finance as the payback time can be much longer than for a technology-enabled business proposition.
Offering this to small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) will provide them with a platform to grow and develop into larger and competitive tech companies.
The goal, as always, is growth.
If we can boost scaling tech companies in their growth journey, we’ll see enormous benefits for the sector and the UK economy as a whole.
The 2018 budget is a great opportunity to do this. We’d like to see it include more cashback schemes since these are the best way to enable SMEs to thrive in the UK - post-Brexit and beyond.
Do you have a question regarding the article above? Fill in the contact form below and we'll answer any queries you may have.
.jpg)
It’s the last budget before the UK is due to leave the European Union, and will set the tone for the British economy in the years after Brexit.
In recognition of this, the Confederation of British Industry (CBI) has issued its budget submission, demanding that “The Chancellor of the Exchequer turn warm words for business into action – no ifs, no buts”.
It urged the Chancellor to raise the annual investment allowance from £200,000 to £500,000 for two years and to explore ways of increasing capital spending in the technology sector.
This comes off the back of news that the UK ranks lowest out of the G7 in terms of business investment as a proportion of GDP. The Director-General of the CBI, Carolyn Fairbairn, noted that the problem doesn’t stem from businesses being reluctant to invest, “but because the conditions are so often not conducive to doing so.”
And of course, when there isn’t enough investment, it directly impacts on productivity, which is at its lowest level since the 1990s. This, for me, is what truly drives the reduction in GDP – and it needs to be solved.
It’s vital that we reverse this, and make the UK into a growth environment for business – especially in the technology sector.
We’re pleased to see these suggestions from the CBI, and we support it in its calls to create a better investment environment. Raising the annual investment allowance is definitely a step in the right direction.
But this only favours businesses that are profitable who can use this allowance. By being focused on profitable businesses incentive depriving start-ups and scale-ups – and there were 10,016 incorporated in 2017 – from accessing the same benefits.
Instead of encouraging profitable businesses to invest more, we want to extend the opportunity to those who haven’t had it previously. And this means young companies who haven’t yet entered profitability or rapidly growing high technology businesses who are already investing but could be encouraged to spend more to be properly world leading.
Focusing on start-ups and scale-ups is the best way to increase the number of businesses who are investing. And since the UK tech sector is powered by these businesses, enabling them to grow seems a winning formula for injecting growth into the whole industry.
A more inclusive approach would be to look into cashback schemes.
Today, it’s probably just as good to leave money in the bank when compared to investing in capital equipment. This is where research and development (R&D) incentives should come into action.
We agree with the CBI that the UK R&D credit scheme should be reviewed to ensure it is the world’s most competitive. Currently, the R&D tax credit scheme works because it offers cashback to loss-making or non-tax paying businesses – which applies to most start-ups or scale-ups. But it is limited in its scope and does not cover capital investments.
The equivalent scheme for capital expenditure does not offer the same cash back benefits and most start-up or scale-up businesses ignore this incentive altogether as it provides no immediate support.
If the UK is to strengthen its position in the technology sector, we need to start seeing a cashback element to improve the return on investment calculations. Why shouldn’t the UK incentives support businesses to investing in the latest development hardware or testing products that could substantially improve the productivity within their R&D teams?
One idea would be to bring in a cashback element to research and development allowance schemes when purchases are related to high technology capital equipment to be used in R&D projects. This would also support those businesses developing technology who tend to struggle for finance as the payback time can be much longer than for a technology-enabled business proposition.
Offering this to small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) will provide them with a platform to grow and develop into larger and competitive tech companies.
The goal, as always, is growth.
If we can boost scaling tech companies in their growth journey, we’ll see enormous benefits for the sector and the UK economy as a whole.
The 2018 budget is a great opportunity to do this. We’d like to see it include more cashback schemes since these are the best way to enable SMEs to thrive in the UK - post-Brexit and beyond.
Do you have a question regarding the article above? Fill in the contact form below and we'll answer any queries you may have.
.jpg&w=520&h=520&crop-to-fit)
Iain Butler
How R&D tax credits can incentivise the technology sector to get creative and experiment
How to work with HMRC to secure your R&D tax credit
Tech and media businesses
5
Contact us
6
We use necessary cookies to make our site work. We’d also like to set optional analytics and marketing cookies. We won't set these cookies unless you choose to turn these cookies on. Using this tool will also set a cookie on your device to remember your preferences.
For more information about the cookies we use, see our Cookies page.
Please be aware:
— If you delete all your cookies you will have to update your preferences with us again.
— If you use a different device or browser you will have to tell us your preferences again.
Necessary cookies help make a website usable by enabling basic functions like page navigation and access to secure areas of the website. The website cannot function properly without these cookies.
Analytics cookies help us to understand how visitors interact with our website by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.
