.jpg)
We advised Black Sun PLC on its merger with People Made Ltd … Read more
In these case studies we show potential solutions for investors or business owners to mitigate the tax implications. … Read more
Sign up to part two of our trustee training series now. … Read more
130 Wood Street, London, EC2V 6DL
enquiries@buzzacott.co.uk T +44 (0)20 7556 1200
The First Tier Tribunal in the case of G4S Corporate Services Ltd has held that an assessment for £1.25m default interest should stand, even though there was no VAT assessment. Invoices for the VAT due on services provided to the Home Office which G4S had incorrectly treated as exempt were raised late and the Home Office had paid the VAT.
G4S argued that default interest was meant to represent commercial restitution, and that the Government had not been deprived of the use of any money at any time, because at all times the VAT amounts were either held by the Home Office (before the VAT was paid) or HMRC (after the VAT was paid). But the tribunal accepted HMRC’s argument that ‘the Crown’ (and thus the Government) was not treated as a single entity for VAT, so the fact that another Government Department held the money instead of HMRC was not enough to avoid the interest penalty. This case provides an illustration of the importance of getting VAT right first time, as even if the VAT is correctly paid later, an interest charge can remain.
If you have a question about this article or VAT in general, complete the form below and one of our experts will contact you.
The First Tier Tribunal in the case of G4S Corporate Services Ltd has held that an assessment for £1.25m default interest should stand, even though there was no VAT assessment. Invoices for the VAT due on services provided to the Home Office which G4S had incorrectly treated as exempt were raised late and the Home Office had paid the VAT.
G4S argued that default interest was meant to represent commercial restitution, and that the Government had not been deprived of the use of any money at any time, because at all times the VAT amounts were either held by the Home Office (before the VAT was paid) or HMRC (after the VAT was paid). But the tribunal accepted HMRC’s argument that ‘the Crown’ (and thus the Government) was not treated as a single entity for VAT, so the fact that another Government Department held the money instead of HMRC was not enough to avoid the interest penalty. This case provides an illustration of the importance of getting VAT right first time, as even if the VAT is correctly paid later, an interest charge can remain.
If you have a question about this article or VAT in general, complete the form below and one of our experts will contact you.
We use necessary cookies to make our site work. We’d also like to set optional analytics and marketing cookies. We won't set these cookies unless you choose to turn these cookies on. Using this tool will also set a cookie on your device to remember your preferences.
For more information about the cookies we use, see our Cookies page.
Please be aware:
— If you delete all your cookies you will have to update your preferences with us again.
— If you use a different device or browser you will have to tell us your preferences again.
Necessary cookies help make a website usable by enabling basic functions like page navigation and access to secure areas of the website. The website cannot function properly without these cookies.
Analytics cookies help us to understand how visitors interact with our website by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.